A Sedona luxury resort had 74% occupancy but RevPAR well below its competitive set. Five levers, pricing, distribution, packaging, seasonality, rate parity, added $1.8M with no new rooms.
01The Situation
The owner had owned the Sedona resort for six years. Occupancy was solid, 74% annually, with summer and fall nearly sold out. But RevPAR was $168 per night compared to a competitive set average of $210 for similar Sedona properties. A competitive analysis commissioned through a travel industry contact made the gap concrete: $1.6M in potential annual revenue being left on the table.
02What We Did
We analyzed two years of booking data by source, lead time, price point, and season. Five levers identified: dynamic pricing was not being used (flat seasonal rates only); OTA commissions averaged 22% versus the 12-15% achievable with direct booking incentives; spa packages were not bundled with rooms; shoulder season rates were not discounted enough; and rate parity with OTAs had drifted.
Yield management software deployed in month one. Three spa packages created by month three. Direct booking incentives promoted through email. Month 18 RevPAR: $225, 34% above the starting point. Annual revenue: $5.4M to $7.2M.
03Client Impact
The owner had been focused on occupancy because that was the metric he could see most easily. RevPAR is the metric that actually matters, it captures both occupancy and rate. Improving RevPAR 34% without changing occupancy meant the resort was simply charging more for the same rooms. The value was always there.
Breakdown
| Improvement Lever | RevPAR Impact | Action Taken | Timeline | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dynamic pricing implementation | $18 increase | Yield management software deployed | Month 1-2 | |
| OTA commission reduction | $12 increase | Direct booking incentives built | Month 2-6 | |
| Package bundling (spa + room) | $14 increase | 3 packages created | Month 1-3 | |
| Shoulder season promotion | $8 increase | Targeted to drive occupancy | Month 4-12 | |
| Rate parity correction | $4 increase | OTA disparity corrected | Month 1 | |
| TOTAL | $57/night increase | All levers combined | 18 months |
What changed
RevPAR Improved 34%, $168 to $225
Five levers implemented over 18 months. Same 64 rooms, dramatically different revenue per room.
OTA Commission Reduced from 22% to 14%
Direct booking share improved from 31% to 52%. Same revenue, less commission paid.
Spa Package Revenue Up 84%
3 packages created. Package bookings now 38% of arrivals. Spa revenue up $284K annually.
Annual Revenue: $5.4M to $7.2M
$1.8M increase with no capacity addition, no major renovation, no change in occupancy.
The owner had been focused on occupancy because that was the metric he could see most easily. RevPAR is the metric that actually matters, it captures both occupancy and rate. Improving RevPAR 34% without changing occupancy meant the resort was simply charging more for the same rooms. The value was always there.
Want results like these?
Book a free consultation — we'll tell you exactly what we'd do.